Let me preface this entry by stating I have two cats and a dog. I love my animals, but in the winter time its tough love and it's like being trapped with roommates too long. I, like most people, want to be environmentally conscience and lower my impact logically. I am not going to grow all my own food right now or buy everything organic and local, we do what we can but it’s just hard on the budget at the moment. I look for low cost easy ways to lower my carbon footprint, taking bags to the grocery store, reusing as much as possible, stuff like that. In the nice long winters here in Wisconsin I have had time to ponder things I really have never thought about like the carbon footprint left by my animals. I mean I pick up my dogs poop and throw it away and I know it goes to the landfill, but what is the impact of that poop and the dog food and other dog products on our earth.
I did a little Google research and I found some pretty interesting statistics on the impact of pets. The best information comes from a book entitled Time to Eat the Dog: The real guide to sustainable living. The title may seem harsh but after reading some of the information provided, Novio, my dog, is looking pretty tasty. For instance, owning a medium sized dog is like owning two SUV's:
To measure the ecological paw, claw and fin-prints of the family pet, the Vales anylized the ingredients of common brands of pet food. They calculated, for example, that a medium-sized dog would consume 90 grams of meat and 156 grams of cereals daily in its recommended 300-gram portion of dried dog food. At its pre-dried weight, that equates to 450 grams of fresh meat and 260 grams of cereal. That means that over the course of a year, Fido wolfs down about 164 kilograms of meat and 95 kilograms of cereals.
It takes 43.3 square metres of land to generate 1 kilogram of chicken per year - far more for beef and lamb - and 13.4 square metres to generate a kilogram of cereals. So that gives him a footprint of 0.84 hectares. For a big dog such as a German shepherd, the figure is 1.1 hectares.
Meanwhile, an SUV - the Vales used a 4.6-litre Toyota Land Cruiser in their comparison - driven a modest 10,000 kilometres a year, uses 55.1 gigajoules, which includes the energy required both to fuel and to build it. One hectare of land can produce approximately 135 gigajoules of energy per year, so the Land Cruiser's eco-footprint is about 0.41 hectares - less than half that of a medium-sized dog.
Basically, owning my medium sized dog is way worse than the a-hole that drives around a hummer. The book goes on to say that cats are like a small car. So here in my house we are driving the equivalent of two small cars and two SUV's not counting our actual car. I will definitely discontinue my judgment of SUV drivers, unless they have two dogs in the back after all I am a hater.
I am not condoning eating dogs or cats or anything but it has swayed my decision about animal ownership. I would never choose to own a Hummer because it seems excessive and wasteful, but I have chosen to own three pets one way or another. The information I read was pretty eye opening. Should cities be more dog friendly or should they be less dog friendly to discourage pet ownership? I know cities like New York make driving a car really expensive and discourage people from driving there with tolls and high costs of parking. Using this logic it would make sense to tax dogs and cats for the added impact on landfills. After all it is a choice to own a dog or cat. I don’t see myself choosing to own any more pets. Of course it is the wintertime and my animals are driving me a little crazy.
This blog has a lot of good information and tips to be a greener pet owner.
If you have any tips especially low cost tips let me know in the comments.